Independent/Reader-funded/Infrastructure, not tokens
DeAINEWS

AI you control — open models, private inference, and the networks that run them.

Provider Policy & Trust

The DeAI Tracker's Verification Gap, Refreshed 2026-10-25

Refreshed 2026-10-25: 17 decentralized-inference providers, four sweep cycles, still 0 verified claims. What 62 claimed, 2 corroborated, 130 unverified mean.

DeAI is powered by Morpheus (mor.org). We cover competing providers on the same terms — see our methodology.

This page is DeAI's standing explainer for the Decentralized Inference Provider Tracker: what the grades mean, where the 17 providers stand, and what has to happen before a number moves. It was first published the week of 2026-09-13, when the tracker had zero history and the Price Index had one snapshot. The 2026-10-25 refresh keeps the grading rule unchanged and updates every number to the current export — generated 2026-10-20, with all 17 records last checked 2026-10-12 — after four weekly sweep cycles: 17 providers, 0 verified claims, 62 entries of dated claim history. A flat grade column alongside a growing audit trail is not a stalled project; it is the tracker working as designed.

Key facts

  • 17 providers tracked, 0 verified. The tracker export generated 2026-10-20 records every provider at record_status: unverified, with all 17 last_checked: 2026-10-12. This is unchanged since the tracker was seeded on 2026-08-24.
  • 62 claimed field values, 2 corroborated, 130 not yet checked. Of 221 graded field entries across the four category groups, 78 carry a non-null value and 143 are still null — the tracker records what is known, not what is plausible.
  • The 2 corroborated values both belong to Chutes: its OpenAI-compatible API and its endpoint URL (https://llm.chutes.ai/v1), supported by public documentation but not yet confirmed by our own probe.
  • Four sweep cycles have run (2026-09-14, 09-21, 10-05, 10-12), appending 17 → 29 → 39 → 54 cumulative history entries. No grade was promoted in any cycle: 32 checks were attempted across the three cycles with resolved claims, and every one stayed at claimed. Cycle 3 holds the intake record — 38 candidates over a two-week window.
  • 7 of 17 providers claim TEE-based confidential inference — Chutes, Morpheus, NEAR AI, Oasis, Phala, SolRouter, and Targon. None has published an attestation our harness could validate; all sit at claimed.
  • The Price Index is five snapshots deep, through 2026-10-12 — the latest delta issue caught DeepSeek V4 Pro snapping back 358% and GLM-5.3 Flash cutting input 85% while raising output 140%. No 2026-10-19 or 2026-10-26 snapshot exists yet.

What the grades actually mean

The tracker uses a five-state grading rule, and the rule is the whole product. A claimed value is a provider's own statement — a line in its docs, a roster entry, a marketing post on X — recorded with its source and date. Claimed is not a synonym for false; it is a synonym for unproven. A provider's claim never promotes itself, no matter how often it is repeated.

Corroborated is one step up: independent documentation points the same way, but our own reproducible check has not run. Chutes' OpenAI compatibility is the tracker's clearest example — the provider documents it publicly and it appears as an OpenRouter provider, which is consistent, but we have not yet probed the endpoint ourselves, so the grade stays corroborated rather than verified.

Verified is reserved for what an independent, reproducible check can confirm: a cryptographic attestation we validated, an API response we observed, on-chain data we queried. Privacy absence-claims — "we retain nothing," "operators cannot see your prompts" — can never reach verified from a policy statement alone. They stay claimed until there is attestation evidence to check, which is why all seven TEE claims in the tracker remain claimed today, four sweep cycles later.

The two remaining states are unverified (nobody has checked this field) and n/a (the field does not apply to this provider). An empty cell is a fact about our knowledge, not a failure of the provider.

The ledger, refreshed 2026-10-25

Every row below is computed directly from the current export with one stated rule — "Fields with values" counts graded fields holding a non-null value in that provider's API, privacy, scale, and onchain groups — and the history column counts that provider's dated claim entries:

ProviderCategoryPrivacy mechanism (claimed)Fields with valuesHistory entries
Akash NetworkGPU marketplacedecentralized41
ChutesBittensor subnetTEE, E2E encryption85
DarkbloomGPU marketplaceE2E encryption, decentralized62
Dolphin NetworkGPU marketplacedecentralized54
EngyBittensor subnetother62
io.netGPU marketplacedecentralized57
Morpheusstandalone networkTEE51
NEAR AIstandalone networkTEE48
Nesastandalone networkother42
OasisTEE playTEE42
Openservstandalone network— (unverified)36
Phala NetworkTEE playTEE66
SolAIGPU marketplacedecentralized31
SolRouterTEE playMPC, TEE35
TargonBittensor subnetTEE42
Venice AIstandalone networkzero-retention44
WardenGPU marketplacedecentralized44

Read this table as a ledger of what is claimed, not a ranking of what is true. Sixteen of seventeen providers are recorded as live; Darkbloom is in public alpha. Every privacy mechanism in the middle column is the provider's own description of itself.

What has changed since September — and what has not

When this page was first published, the tracker had no history and the check harness had never run. Four weeks of sweeps changed the first part: the append-only history now holds 54 dated entries, every one sourced from the provider's own public statements, and the sweep digest chain records each run's intake, checks, and blockers — including cycle 3's recorded fix of the probe-grading rule and its neutrality gate, which has intercepted favorable Morpheus items in all three cycles that surfaced one, writing none of them.

What has not changed is the grade column. The check harness has attempted 32 observations across the cycles with resolved claims — direct probes (one answered HTTP 400, two gated HTTP 402), attestation lookups that found nothing published to validate, and OpenRouter cross-checks that found no listing to compare against. None produced evidence strong enough to promote a grade, and every blocker is recorded by name: unset API bases, a pending chain adapter, missing access keys. The zero column now carries reasons, not silence.

The same discipline applies to the Price Index, which has grown from one snapshot to five dated weekly issues — the most recent catching DeepSeek V4 Pro's 358% catalog snap-back — and to the Refusal Index, which remains unscored until its judge harness ships. Two series, two different states, one rule: growth only by dated, reproducible observations, never by silent edits.

What has to happen before a number moves

Only one thing appends a promotion to this ledger: a dated, reproducible check that survives. The check harness is the pipeline that does it — probing an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, fetching a provider's model catalog, validating a TEE attestation, querying a subnet's emissions on-chain, sampling a price. A claim that survives the check is promoted with the date and method recorded; one that fails is annotated, never silently rewritten.

The unblock list is unchanged from cycle 3's report: a second environment-store key unblocks the two Venice 402 probes; four api_base values unlock twelve API probes; the chain adapter would put thirteen on-chain queries to work. Until those land, the correct tracker state is exactly what the export shows — a field of claimed and unverified values, two corroborated endpoints, and zero verified records. A quiet week published as a quiet week is what keeps the loud weeks believable.

Questions

How many decentralized inference providers has DeAI verified?
Zero of the 17 tracked providers hold a verified claim as of the 2026-10-20 export. The tracker holds 62 claimed field values, 2 corroborated values (Chutes' OpenAI compatibility and endpoint URL, from document review), and 130 fields not yet checked. 'Claimed' means the provider said it; nothing more.
What is the difference between claimed, corroborated, and verified?
Claimed is a provider's own statement, recorded as marketing until cross-checked. Corroborated means independent documentation supports it but our own reproducible check has not run. Verified requires an independent, reproducible probe — an attestation we validated, an API response we observed, on-chain data we queried. Only the check harness promotes a grade.
What changed in the tracker since the September verification-gap report?
The audit trail grew and the grade census did not. Four weekly sweeps have run (through 2026-10-12), appending 54 dated claim entries, and the Price Index grew from one snapshot to five dated issues (through 2026-10-12). Across all four cycles the harness attempted 32 checks and promoted 0 grades — every provider record still reads unverified.
Did the DeAI price index change this week?
The Price Index's fifth and most recent observation is dated 2026-10-12: DeepSeek V4 Pro snapped back 358% to $0.9553/$1.9105 per million tokens and GLM-5.3 Flash cut input 85% while raising output 140%. No newer snapshot exists as of 2026-10-25, so that issue stands as the current record and is not rewritten.
Why publish a report when nothing changed?
An append-only tracker is only credible if quiet weeks are also on the record. A week with no delta is itself a data point: it means the check harness did not promote or demote any claim. Publishing the ledger keeps the audit trail continuous and prevents a silent gap that later looks like a missing week.

Sources

  1. DeAI Decentralized Inference Provider Tracker (JSON export, generated 2026-10-20) — DeAI News
  2. DeAI Price Index snapshot (JSON, as-of 2026-10-12) — DeAI News
  3. Sweep Cycle 3: Record Claim Intake, Still Zero Promotions — DeAI News
  4. DeAI methodology — DeAI News
  5. DeAI Provider Trust Tracker — DeAI News

About DeAI

DeAI is an independent publication covering open-weight AI models, private inference, and decentralized infrastructure — the tools for running AI you actually control. We test providers on price, privacy, and refusal behavior and publish the numbers, not the vibes. DeAI is powered by Morpheus (mor.org), a decentralized inference marketplace, and covers it on the same terms as every other provider.

Powered by Morpheus and StrandCMS

Morpheus is a decentralized inference marketplace, covered on the same terms as every other provider — we rank it wherever the data lands. StrandCMS is the open-source, agent-first framework this site is built on.

Learn more about the Morpheus Inference API →

Sponsor disclosure — not editorial

Powered by Morpheus and StrandCMS. Morpheus is a decentralized inference marketplace, covered on the same terms as every other provider. StrandCMS is the open-source, agent-first framework this site is built on.

Learn more →